<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jags D Can&#8217;t Handle The Hurry-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackandteal.com/2012/09/10/jags-d-cant-handle-the-hurry-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackandteal.com/2012/09/10/jags-d-cant-handle-the-hurry-up/</link>
	<description>A Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://blackandteal.com/2012/09/10/jags-d-cant-handle-the-hurry-up/comment-page-1/#comment-949865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackandteal.com/?p=11695#comment-949865</guid>
		<description>You said Ponder was weak before this last game and he went 20 of 27 for 270 yards, that&#039;s 74% passing, including two huge drives to tie the game with 15 seconds remaining and then to win the game in overtime. Now you&#039;re still saying he&#039;s no good and this game was a fluke. Before this game you were talking up Gabbert saying how much he had improved and how he was the superior QB. While Gabbert had a decent day he was still only 58% accurate and folded during their OT drive. You need some objectivity man. Let the season play out a little bit before you start making proclamations. Let Gabbert prove he has actually improved his game before you declare him the next great commodity. Let Ponder get a few games under his belt before you label him a mediocre QB who got lucky. That said your observation about the Jags defense not being able to handle the no-huddle is solid but that&#039;s a problem most defenses have which begs the question, why don&#039;t more teams run a no-huddle offense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said Ponder was weak before this last game and he went 20 of 27 for 270 yards, that&#8217;s 74% passing, including two huge drives to tie the game with 15 seconds remaining and then to win the game in overtime. Now you&#8217;re still saying he&#8217;s no good and this game was a fluke. Before this game you were talking up Gabbert saying how much he had improved and how he was the superior QB. While Gabbert had a decent day he was still only 58% accurate and folded during their OT drive. You need some objectivity man. Let the season play out a little bit before you start making proclamations. Let Gabbert prove he has actually improved his game before you declare him the next great commodity. Let Ponder get a few games under his belt before you label him a mediocre QB who got lucky. That said your observation about the Jags defense not being able to handle the no-huddle is solid but that&#8217;s a problem most defenses have which begs the question, why don&#8217;t more teams run a no-huddle offense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 6/11 queries in 0.037 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 279/283 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: blackandteal.com @ 2013-05-24 05:37:51 by W3 Total Cache -->