Using a three wideout set, with Lewis in blocking or receiving with one man in the backfield will probably be the most effective lineup that could be utilized. No defense is going to jam all three receivers. So if one of the wideouts can get open, and with the defense not knowing if Lewis or the back is going to block or receive, the options could be endless. As long as the line can hold up long enough for the quarterback to find the open man, this offense has the potential to be explosive.

I agree, that whoever plays slot this year stands to benefit the most from us not having the protype #1 receiver. Him, the tight ends and the running backs will be the most pivotal in our passing game if you ask me.

As far as Jackson, he is getting screwed. San Diego’s front office is known for playing a little dirtier than others. I believe he had a DUI at the beginning of his career.

It’s my belief that when a player comes from a problem scenario and enters into a good atmoshpere, things can work out. Think of the Patriots and how they handle a “problem”. They’re locker room is built for no-nonsense and that is how I see the current locker room in Jacksonville. I think it would work just fine. Garrard and Jackson were great together at the Pro Bowl.

I must confess I agree that GM Gene Smith would be heavily against it for two reasons. 1. Its a big money free agent signing and 2. He has a history of not being a poster child for great character. Actions speak louder than words and he has been in the media for having issues with the organization and paranoia would state that it could happen again, regardless of the environment that has been constructed and the contract that would be given.

As far as Dillard, you’ll have to really look under rocks (see Geico commercials) to find someone that is a bigger fan than me. I think he should be starting.

As far as Thomas, I guess we’ll see but I do like your argument.

Thanks for the conversation, Kevin. It was great!